Archives for category: Uncategorized

Lately I’ve been following along with P2PU by the mailing list as I haven’t been able to commit to Thursday’s  calls.  This has allowed for some deeper reflection slightly external to the core community.

I’ve been chewing over the idea of the P2PU Challenge model for the past weeks, trying to work out how it fits in amongst people, online facilitation and social peer-education.  Challenges was once just a School of Webcraft experiment, but gradually they are expanding in popularity as an approach to be used more broadly across P2PU.

Chloe‘s going to be constructing another great post about challenges, but I wanted to write about my understanding of P2Pu Challenges from a community member’s perspective.

—–

The way I see Challenges is that they provide a focus for what is being learnt, i.e. the instructional materials / course design side of a P2PU learning experience, and bring content creation to the fore. You come to P2PU to learn by completing a challenge in the company of others (in a course or more openly and casually). You might also come to create Challenges or support other people’s learning by facilitating Challenges (your own or others’).

The Challenge acts as the focus or framing of a learning experience in which the objectives, activities and output / assessment components are included.   Challenges go beyond defining goals, objectives and milestones and consider learning design in a specific P2PU context:

  • they highlight the need for online peer-interaction
  • reinforce formative, peer-supported assessment
  • recognise that Challenges can make use of existing learning materials whether they be YouTube tutorials or complete OER courses.
Orange Hopscotch - (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) Some rights reserved by mkw87

Orange Hopscotch by mkw87 (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Challenges also make the act of designing a P2PU learning experience more public and open, and a specific activity that can then be expanded upon socially and with focus within the context of a course.  Until now the course design process has never been a particularly collaborative or public activity, but has been obscured behind the “Start Your Own” course button.  The site interface and Course Designers’ Handbook have previously tried to encourage course creators to include and consider these design principles, but not so prominently.

Challenges share many similar elements with instructional and learning design, but the Challenge “model” is a much more consumable and far less boring entry point for people who wouldn’t otherwise consider the ADDIE model or similar when designing a course.

In fact, Challenges act as a very specific entry point and invitation into the P2PU learning space and community. By making the creation of a high-quality Challenge a goal in itself, it is easier to engage people in discussing and working towards developing high quality online peer-learning materials.

By clarifying that Challenges are about learning materials (specific to  peer learning online) I’ve been able to move past a stumbling block, a hesitation that I’ve felt about Challenges and where they fit in with P2PU.  That has to do with the act of content creation and the previous reluctance of P2Pu to identify itself as a site for the production of educational resources.

Previously, I don’t feel that the idea of useful and quality content was seen as a distinct priority or outcome of involvement in P2PU. Sure, P2PU’s user content was placed under a default CC-BY-SA license, but content that arose as a by-product of peer-learning, eg. comments from course participants or slightly remixed OER materials.

Challenges mean that P2PU is now encouraging educational content creation as a specific goal and activity for users. It’s important that this is seen and publicly identified as a new, distinct and potentially valuable process within P2Pu – open collaborative learning material development (making context specific OER, not just “learning with others”).

In general, after some initial scepticism, I’m finding this very exciting. Of course it raises some further questions:

  • If some challenges end up being very good, how might they be used outside of P2PU?
  • How could materials be exported (Worksheets, Course activity books)?
  • Is this an opportunity for income generation – receive printed versions of “authenticated” challenges (Kickstarter?)??
  • Could individual Challenge creators use P2PU as a marketplace for their content?
  • Will the existing license be appropriate for Challenges as they evolve?
  • Challenges highlight that learning design for collaborative online learning is a specific context – What is the process for upgrading and remixing existing, formal OER from a traditional delivery to a P2PU style?
  • How could a collaborative Challenge design process be facilitated?
  • If Challenges make  content for peer-learning online, is there a similar process or thing which helps build a good, cohesive cohort of learners?  What would that look like?

I’d love to hear about your understanding of Challenges and ideas of where they might be headed. Please leave a comment.

Enhanced by Zemanta

My summer exploded and what I’d intended as lazy days spent reading and learning turned into many days spent sitting on trains and planes and hanging out, researching and working with lovely friends and colleagues in Canada and parts of Northern Europe.

I did manage to fit in a couple of vacation days in the Netherlands and Berlin, but all that moving around made it very difficult for me even to begin participating in the Facilitating Online course I’d expressed an interest in.

I did learn about many other things along the way including:
better sailing skills, more about the Mozilla Foundation, what a resilient Luminous Green future could be like, how to work with Media Wiki, how to identify wild cherries, what a hagstone is and how to properly tie clove hitches and bowlines.

That is great, and as much as I love the informal bits and pieces of learning that are a part of everyday life, I’d love to better focus on my slowly developing formal study with USQ as well as more formal online courses such as Facilitating Online or the upcoming PLENK. Which leads me to the question – if you’re on the road often, whether it be for a long-distance relationship, fun or work – can flexible learning truly support a flexible, often nomadic life?

When online “flexible” learning involves downloading some PDFs and writing the occasional essay, it is still possible to get some study done while in transit. Travel is great for focusing on offline tasks – the articles you never read, the discussion responses you meant to write.    However the style of learning that I’m most interested in (as a student, facilitator and teacher) requires a continued online presence, so that one can socially engage with your peers.

I don’t have answers for this – though I have suspicions that it may involve far better time management and commitment than I’m currently providing.   I’m also expecting that I’d be laying out some major data roaming charges so that I can have good web access whether I’m in an airport in Vancouver or on a  train in Belgium.

A few weeks ago I started working as the project lead and course wrangler for the Mozilla Drumbeat project, the P2PU School of Webcraft. I’m still reeling from the coolness of being able to combine my interests in technology, the open web, open and alternative education and amazing people into one amazing job.

Despite getting the chance to visit Vancouver and Whistler in British Columbia, Canada for the Mozilla Summit where I met some amazing Mozillians, Drumbeaters and P2PUers in person, most of my encounters with volunteers, peers and colleagues take place online. We use mailing lists, wikis, Skype and community calls as the primary means of communication and while it is amazing how technology has brought us closer together, we still have to communicate and listen and get through agendas and make decisions.  That’s difficult enough in real life. Via electronic media, regardless of the synchronicity, this can be very difficult.

I’m still getting used to the collaborative nature of wikis, and learning to deal with the pauses that need to happen on conference calls to signal that someone’s finished speaking and that there’s a gap free for the next person to speak into. In some ways I wish for the traditions of CB radio where someone says “Over” to convey that they’ve finished what they needed to say.

So, recognising that I need to lead online meetings, and will be working over mailing lists and forums to come to decisions, and will be both leading and assisting in the running of online courses, getting better at this facilitation things sounds like a great idea.  Which is why I’ll be experimenting with more online learning of my own in the form of the Facilitating Online course run by Otago Polytechnic through wikieducator.org.

I’ve been blogging for years over at battlecat.net, but after I started the DIY Masters project I found it quite difficult to mix what had been a very personal blog with more specific content about a learning project. I guess it’s like trying to run a business from home, or trying to write a PhD while in your pyjamas, I just couldn’t separate the personal from the public and as a result wrote very little at all!

So I’m paying attention to that experience and setting up a separate blog which focuses on the big topic of learning (and teaching) whether the context is education within formal settings or learning in a more DIY and independent way.

Of course, focus is something which is really important for a student, and as someone who’s returning to formal university study after 6 years as an employee and freewheeling traveller, it’s a significant change to make. It’s not like I wasn’t learning over that time – I’ve been to German and French classes, went to TAFE for some screen printing evening classes, and there was that self-directed learning experiment. However, even though I’ve been learning and studying all along, there is something very different about being back in a formal university degree.  It does seem to matter a whole lot more and carry a lot more weight than self-organised learning.

Obviously, there’s a whole lot of cultural conditioning that makes degrees important, supposedly, they get you better jobs, give you opportunity to study at an even higher level and to work as a researcher… Oh, and in most countries they cost a hell of a lot more money than learning from books and open course ware.  So the fear of losing money does drive one to focus on their study to a certain extent.

Another thing that provides me with more focus in this type of formal study is that there are other people.  A lack of learning peers was one of my biggest challenges when trying to explore my DIY Masters: sure, I had the freedom to choose what I studied, but I had no one to talk the ideas over with.  And in other types of tertiary learning, such as studying German with other adults I found that while I was studying with social peers, they were not studying for the same reasons as me.  So, even though I’m studying this degree in an asynchronous online learning environment, I am still tremendously motivated to “turn up to class” because there are other people participating and sharing in the same learning experience as me.

It’s also different studying at a post-graduate level – for the first time in my life, I feel like I’m studying a topic in order to take myself deeper into a field of knowledge that I want to be an expert about. Looking back at my undergraduate learning, and at the undergraduates I teach, there’s a strong sense of learning (and teaching) a very general grounding of a topic.  Without prior knowledge to draw on, or a sense of how the knowledge might be used,  undergraduate learning is a very different experience to the way graduate students learn and are taught about a field they already have some experience in.

Maybe the end of this post is a good place to actually throw some of that formal learning into the mix in order to think about this changing learning experience in terms of andragogy, a topic popularised by Malcolm Knowles.  I’ve been really satisfied and appreciative of the range of readings we’re directed to in our course, but this reading at The Encyclopedia of Informal Education was particularly important to me. The summary of Malcolm Knowles‘ work within adult education clarified many of the motivations that fuelled my informal learning project last year and as a result, this current re-entry into formal learning.

There just happens to be a passage that describes this change of attitude between my undergraduate experiences and my in+formal post-graduate learning. It’s a summary of the assumptions about adult learners that andragogy is based on:

  1. Self-concept: As a person matures his self concept moves from one of being a dependent personality toward one of being a self-directed human being
  2. Experience: As a person matures he accumulates a growing reservoir of experience that becomes an increasing resource for learning.
  3. Readiness to learn. As a person matures his readiness to learn becomes oriented increasingly to the developmental tasks of his social roles.
  4. Orientation to learning. As a person matures his time perspective changes from one of postponed application of knowledge to immediacy of application, and accordingly his orientation toward learning shifts from one of subject-centeredness to one of problem centredness.
  5. Motivation to learn: As a person matures the motivation to learn is internal (Knowles 1984:12).
  6. (Smith, 1996; 1999)

Smith, M. K. (1996; 1999) ‘Andragogy’, the encyclopaedia of informal education, http://www.infed.org/lifelonglearning/b-andra.htm. Last update: September 07, 2009.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.