Archives for category: my learning journey

There’s ongoing discussion about Mozilla’s role as a ‘teacher’ and how it fits alongside that of “inventor”. In a recent blog post, Mark Surman wanted to find out whether “Mozilla as teacher“ resonates and what other terms might be appropriate.

Having spent the past year with Mozilla helping people learn, I wanted to respond, both with how Mozilla could position themselves and, in a secondary post, on what Mozilla should teach.

Mozilla as ‘teacher’?

“What’s a less top-down word than ‘teacher?’”
@openmatt

When identifying Mozilla’s teacherly role it’s useful to look for a friendly term that implies trust and doesn’t intimidate potential participants. It should encourage collaborative participation and new ways of learning together and on the web. Mozilla should, with this word, be represented as teacher, mentor, innovator, expert, facilitator, guide, communicator and technician.

So, they’re not just a teacher then…

If not a teacher, then what am I?

It’s a tough ask and it struck a nerve. Over the last years of fine-tuning Twitter profiles, blog “About” pages and public speaking bios I looked for a similarly encompassing term to convey my old role within School of Webcraft and beyond.

I wanted to be a “learning [r]evolutionary”. It implies change whether it happens slowly or fast. But it takes some explaining, a commitment to questionable square brackets and is problematic when used on passports and visas.

I am here for the learning revolution

CC-BY-SA - Bill Moseley

For a long time I primarily identified myself as “learning activist“, but I was stuck with a term that intimidated some people and confused everyone else. When an activist isn’t agitating for change, what do they actually do?  Well, sometimes I teach, I facilitate, I develop educational tools, I research and learn, and most importantly I believe that we can continually identify better ways for people to learn. How to convey that complexity?

In the end I’ve reclaimed “educator” as the umbrella term with which I can start [and end] discussions about what it is I actually do. It’s understandable, can be taken seriously, but most importantly it communicates that my primary goal is to help people learn. Sure, “educator” is a little unsexy and at times can be formal, but in the end, it unpacks to include roles such as teacher, mentor, edupunk and activist.

Education involves consciously setting out to learn. It also involves certain values and commitments.
infed.org: “Being an Informal Educator”

There definitely is some reclaiming that needs to happen for “educator”: to extricate the identity from degrading formal educational systems, to divorce the term from its relationship to “instruction” and “knowledge transfer” and to site it as a role which covers the many ways in which people consciously help others learn.

By reclaiming “educator” can we also make it useful for Mozilla?

“Mozilla as educator”

I have a feeling that Mozilla as “Educator” has resonance and a better scope to describe the range of projects that support people learning to use and make on the web:

In just the same way that “Mozilla as inventor” can unpack to allow discussions of Mozilla as hacker, innovator and creator I think it’s important to easily convey that Mozilla can be teacher, mentor and facilitator, and generally an educator.

Over at Mozzadrella, Vanessa, a fellow P2PU community member has been writing about the challenges of supporting learner responsibility and trying to be a facilitator, but not a teacher. I started to write a comment, but it emerged into a rare, spontaneous blogpost.

Expecting learners to take responsibility for their own learning is a built-in value for P2PU–the courses are free, so our participants don’t “have” to do anything… Balancing the need for some structure with this kind of freedom is a task I’ve found particularly difficult.

I’ve been thinking a lot about these issues, especially how to balance independent learning with the collective study group / course participants’ learning.
i.e. How can you herd cats while still recognising that each cat is a VERY special snowflake ?

Additionally, most people initiate a course out of their own interest and are learners with needs of their own to be met, not just a herder of cats!

Freestyle Learning Organisation Notes

There’s a new type of facilitation and participation model which we (peer and non-formal / informal learners) need to surface and define more tightly both for online and real world groups. Many facilitators and participants within P2PU and similar learning communities have instincts and innate knowledge that they apply to these situations, but we still haven’t worked out how to identify, clarify or share this practice well yet.  In particular we need to develop models that support the needs of learners working through existing course structures (eg. MIT Open Courseware – Physics 1) or groups who are working through an emerging problem space without clear learning guidelines in place (eg. What Philosophers Can Do for Artists)

That said, working towards a facilitation model like this would not produce something that is fixed and compulsory to use within a community like P2PU. I think that maybe it would be more like the many versions of World Cafe, Open Space, Unconference facilitation that exist and which emerge into new forms such as the Book Sprint methodology. A hackable model that is useful for its core approach and recommendations, but that can be reinterpreted and modified for the facilitator and specific learning context.

I’ve written a little about how to use open space idea gathering methodologies at a task development stage before. In addition I believe that there’s a lot to be learnt about the “cat herding” skills that facilitators use and that online learning facilitators can build on too.

Having just led some live facilitation in an open space manner last weekend I’m reflecting on how facilitators need to use an iron fist within a velvet glove as they keep participants on track and in line with the process’s social contract. Sure, in an “open” format like this discussion is emergent and driven by participants needs, but a break out session is still time defined and with clear report backs! In some contexts participants turning up late to a session are threatened with public singing as a punishment. What can we learn from methodologies such as this to support a peer learning group?

Maybe its best for organisers to be a little bit tighter with when new learners can join a group, or to work with participants to define mutually agreed due dates for collectively identified tasks? I don’t know, but I have a feeling that in order to support effective “free and open participation” within groups we (facilitators) might find ourselves turning more to self-imposed structures that benefit both us and our peer learners.

As part of the Free Culture Incubator (FCI) series, I’ll be running a workshop in Berlin at the end of August on self-organised and free learning culture framed around the question:

How we can navigate, define, share and remix our own learning in ever-changing contexts?

More information and registration form at the Transmediale website.

Ela Kagel asked me in 2010 to present an open learning topic as part of FCI workshop series. I’m really grateful for this opportunity to meet with other people and discuss the challenges of learning “openly and freely” outside (and between) formal education contexts.

I’m conscious that we’ll end up raising more questions than we find answers, but longer term I’m looking forward to the continued discussions that will emerge.  One of the subgoals of the workshop is to identify ways in which these discussions of a new learning culture can continue.

As the workshop is only for half a day our immediate output will be restricted, but what we do produce will be released under an open license, with both participants and everyone else invited to respond.

If you’re unable to attend due to time or geographic reasons, it would still be great to hear your voice. To share a statement, ask a question or offer a resource, please sign-up to the workshop wiki.

I just helped facilitate the first synchronous meeting for the Blogging and Writing For The Web (B&W4TW) study group, and I think it went really well, great in fact.  I previously organised a basic web development course at P2PU, but until recently had no opportunity to organise a non-Webcraft project. This is a great opportunity to learn something new, improve my existing skills and to put some ideas about collaborative online learning into practice.

Blogging and Writing for the Web Study Group activity wall showing comments from group members

Study Group Activity Wall

I started the group at P2PU following a twitter conversation with Laura and Alina.  I wanted to improve my blogging in general and also want to feel more confident about my professional online writing skills within the School of Webcraft project.

Are we forming a study group or a support group?

One of the interesting things that came out of the meeting today was the feeling that B&W4TW acts not only as a study group where we improve our skills, but it also acts as a support group for people who, as Lynn described it, are “sole practitioners“.

We identified that we wanted to create an ongoing group that will continue to give value to participants even if the founding members feel confident enough to “graduate” and leave the group. Blackstar mentioned that as blogging is an online process where you can always improve, it’s difficult to identify what the conditions of study group completion would be.

Hacking Open Space Techniques and Bringing Them to the “Web”

This meeting allowed me to run an online hack of a facilitation technique that I’ve experienced in several open-space style events and which Etherpad seemed suited for.

Participants are invited to brainstorm the topics they wish to talk about (within the framing of the meeting), write it on post-it notes (1 idea per post-it!) and then their notes are shared on a large wall. The second stage of the process invites participants to sort through the ideas, find common themes and create category titles for the groupings, thereby identifying common interests across the group.

Is there a name for this technique? Leave a comment and any relevant links please!

This blogging study group meeting seemed the perfect place to test these ideas out. We met using the live chat tool Voxli and kept notes in Etherpad. We could identify common goals and issues we wanted to work through with the group and then use these shared issues as a way of identifying tasks that we can respond to within the P2PU Study Group. We spent about 5 minutes identifying our personal goals, another 5 minutes sorting them out and then spent 10 minutes or so working on tasks for the major categories we identified.

I made a screencast of the process in Etherpad – please excuse the demo watermark!

5 people participated in this process and it worked quite well. Working with a larger group would be difficult and one way I’d consider hacking the process would be to invite only 2 or 3 people to sort the ideas into groups. In a physical space it’s possible to talk with each other in the sorting process and to collaborate on group names – this is much harder to do online.

In general though, I think that this is a very valuable exercise for P2PU learning groups to work through at the beginning of their life-cycle. It identifies shared learning goals and gives everyone a part to play in the development of the group.

What we ended up with

We’re planning to meet again next Friday at the same time and next week someone else will take the role of primary facilitator.  We also recognised that the meeting time was difficult for those outside of Europe and East-Coast USA and encouraged members out of these time-zones to setup their own meetings if possible. We identified a list of key areas to work on in the group and have started creating tasks based on work we did in the meeting.

If you’re interested in participating in the Blogging and Writing For The Web study group, we’d love to have you join in! It’s easy, just create a P2PU account and sign-up to the group!

The lovely people at Subnet posted the video of the talk I gave in Salzburg at the end of March on “shaping the crowd” and open-learning and identity.

subnetTALK: Pippa Buchanan – shaping the crowd from subnetTALK on Vimeo.

I mention P2PU and School of Webcraft a little bit within the context of new places for learning, but primarily this talk is about how we can take control of our own learning by sharing and being open and reflects on my own experiences with the DIY Masters project.

Slides for the talk are available at Slideshare.

Over at P2PU (the non-Webcraft bit) I’m participating in a book group on Ivan Illych’s Deschooling Society. I’ve been meaning to read this and other Illych texts for years, ever since I met Dougald, and first heard him speak at Future Sonic 2008.

Anyway, I’ve posted my reflections to the first chapter within the group discussion, but have included a copy here as well. I’m looking forward to reading the rest of Deschooling Society and seeing how my attitudes change.

If you’re interested in participating in the group, you can still sign-up!

Read the rest of this entry »

This is slightly belated, but following the Drumbeat Festival: Learning, Freedom and the Web, both the School of Webcraft and myself were mentioned in an article from German magazine Brand Eins.

You can read a web version of the article (minus all the photos) here.

 

My partner and I have been located in Australia and New Zealand for the last month or so, both trying to keep up with work while we catch up with Antipodean family and friends. In between fighting the never-ending battles against our email inboxes and waking up at odd hours to join in community calls, we’ve also been speaking to audiences about our work and personal projects. So far we’ve spoken at two Dorkbots – one in Canberra in the middle of December and last week for Dorkbot Sydney at Serial Space (Thanks Pia!).

Next week we head further west towards my home-town of Adelaide and into deeper time-zone confusion. It’s the first time I’ve been back home in over 2 years, and on Wednesday February 9th I’ll finally have a chance to talk about what I’m working on to a South Australian audience.

I love A-Town. Linocut print by Pippa Buchanan

I love A-Town. Linocut print by Pippa Buchanan

I’m really excited to share P2PU, School of Webcraft and Drumbeat with my family and old friends.  What’s even cooler is that we’ll be talking at the Adelaide Hacker Space which is hosted by Format. I’ve been following the founding of Format space, the festival and related projects like Renew Adelaide ever since I left for Europe and it’s exciting to know that such exciting collaborative and DIY projects are running in Adelaide. I have a feeling the participatory and DIY background of Format and the Hacker Space group will provide a really great context for talking about peer learning and the open web.

On the same evening my partner, Tim Boykett will  be talking about experimentation, collaboration and research at  Time’s Up, the art collective and research group he’s been a member of since 1996.

You can find out information about both talks and the Adelaide Hacker Space here.

Where: Format, 15 Peel Street, city.
When: 6pm, Wednesday February 9th
Cost: Free
Facebook event: link

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.